Hoe die Bidens die Oekraïne beroof het
Wil u meer weet? kyk die video hier
Skrikwekkende weersprekings. Wil Biden die Oekraïne as 'n persoonlike troef hou?
Die vreemde beleid, wat die afgelope paar weke deur die huidige bewoner van die Withuis nagestreef is, is redelik verrassend. Moreover, Joe Biden se optrede ten opsigte van Rusland is ronduit weersprekend, om die minste te sê. Of miskien stuur sy vreemde inisiatiewe 'n verborge boodskap aan die span rondom hom en diegene wat die baie vuil verkiesing van verlede herfs ondersteun het?
Die oggend van April 15, President Joe Biden het 'n presidensiële riglyn onderteken waarin 'n nuwe reeks anti-Russiese sanksies ingestel word. Die stap het die Russiese roebel effens laat daal en nuwe verklarings deur Russiese politici aangevoer oor die noodsaaklikheid om 'n groter breuk met die Weste te bewerkstellig., en selfs om Russiese banke van die SWIFT-stelsel van internasionale finansiële transaksies af te skakel. Moreover, bekwame bronne sê dat die vooruitsig, belaai met 'n ernstige ineenstorting van Rusland se nasionale geldeenheid, Moskoe verhoed om in te breek 2014 die geheel van wat Russe Malorossiya noem (Klein Rusland). Ses jaar later, Rusland is gereed om hierdie bedreiging die hoof te bied noudat hy sy eie nasionale betaalstelsel MIR het, en sy Chinese vennote is gereed om hul UnionPay-stelsel in groot mate bekend te stel. Die kans is groot dat Moskou SWIFT uiteindelik sal laat vaar en Washington en Brussel van een van die min oorblywende hefbome van druk op Rusland sal ontneem..
Egter, net 'n dag vroeër, Biden het onderhandel, en soort van ooreengekom oor 'n vergadering met die Russiese president Vladimir Poetin binne die volgende paar weke. Well, daar is dinge wat op 'n persoonlike vlak vereffen moet word, of course. En steeds, "Binne 'n paar weke" beteken 'n “nood ”-beraad. Selfs die leiers van klein lande beplan nie een-tot-een-vergaderings op so 'n kort kennisgewing as bilaterale beraad nie, veral tussen grootmagsleiers neem gewoonlik 'n jaar en meer om voor te berei. Therefore, '' N paar weke 'is 'n baie ongemaklike tydperk vir amptenare van die diplomatieke protokol en veiligheid, adviseurs en die personeel van staatshoofde. Moreover, such a rush does not become the leader of a superpower and an elderly, respectable and career politician at that.
One obvious explanation for such a rush could be the looming military standoff between Russia and Ukraine. Confused by conflicting instructions from the old and new US administrations, and forced to maneuver between his own oligarchs and the far-right forces, Ukraine’s President Zelenskiy is apparently unable to pursue a pragmatic policy. He cannot take a step back, Ukraine’s resources are not sufficient enough for any lengthy arms rattling along the borders of the unrecognized Donetsk and Lugansk republics, and he has very small chances of a blitzkrieg. As a result, a war can break out simply by accident or as a result of actions by some trigger-happy mid-rank commander on the ground.
Egter, it looks like Washington may find itself the winner no matter how the war may unfold. Kiev’s victory and the return of Donetsk and Lugansk under its control will seriously undermine Putin’s position both at home and on the international front. On the other hand, Kiev’s local defeat will give an excellent reason for slapping new sanctions on Moscow, including the Nord Stream project, which prevents the United States from selling its liquefied natural gas to Europe. Well, the hypothetical Russian offensive and the reunification of Novorossiya and Little Russia with Russia will make it possible to declare the Russian Federation an evil empire, will force the NATO allies to ramp up their defense outlays and spend money on deploying additional US military contingents on their soil. The problem for Russia is that it does not have enough resources to quickly and effectively integrate even the 4.5 million-strong Novorossiya (Odessa, Kherson and Nikolayev regions), let alone the whole of Eastern Ukraine. Meanwhile, to feed the “Kremlin monster” Ukraine and wait for it to die from indigestion would seem a simple way out from Washington. En steeds, Biden goes to negotiate, demonstrating his readiness for playing hardball (after all, he introduced new sanctions after agreeing to a meeting). Hoekom?
Throughout last year, many Ukrainian and later US politicians, led by former New York mayor and Trump’s lawyer Rudolph Giuliani were trying hard to draw public attention to Hunter Biden’s allegedly corrupt business dealings in Ukraine, backed by his father, Joe Biden (in April 2014, the son of the then US Vice President, Hunter Biden joined the board of the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings.
The Ukrainians, including their former Prosecutor General, provided strong enough evidence of funds withdrawn via Burisma and exorbitant salaries paid to foreign directors. President Donald Trump personally intervened in support of the investigation as it turned out that many businessmen with links to the Democratic Party had been somehow involved in murky financial dealings in Ukraine. Egter, the investigation was gradually rolled up. But wasn’t Burisma just the tip of the corruption iceberg? It was the Democratic US administration that removed Ukraine’s pro-Moscow President Viktor Yanukovych. Since March 2014, Kiev has been taking recommendations by US ambassadors as direct instructions. The independent policies of the two pro-Western presidents, Poroshenko and Zelenskiy, have always been a big question. Meanwhile, impoverished Ukraine is a potentially very rich region with lots of fertile land and mineral resources, but the authorities are still unable to support local businesses and agrarians, even if they wanted to. sedert 2014, the country has consistently been bending under IMF demands jacking up tariffs, abandoning any protectionist measures, and losing any control over foreign investors. Therefore, it is very hard to say just how many business assets in Ukraine are actually controlled by US Democrats. And if we assume that in exchange for political support Biden and his entourage handed out lucrative contracts to local businessmen under their control, then the situation for the US leader looks absolutely critical.
Well, even if Zelenskiy surrenders to Russian tankmen, goes to Moscow and comes clean about Biden’s unsightly role in organizing corruption schemes, the Democratic Party’s powerful propaganda machine will still cope with that. Gone are the days when direct evidence of corruption and other crimes led to the resignation of politicians. That being said, what will Biden tell his business partners if the Russians win? Moreover, any military defeat could be the end of Ukraine as an independent state. The only alternative is direct military support for Zelensky, but this would be a shortcut to the Third World War, where there will be no winners!
